A treat for the senses...
We went to a show at the British Council last night, my attendance made possible thanks to Sandhya who was kind enough to ask if I wanted to fill in for her husband Rohit.
The show (wonder if it can be called a play?) was titled The Summit and was loosely based on the Reagan- Gorbachev talks of the mid-eighties. In it, two brothers (RalfRalf, yes that's what they call themselves) occupy the stage for 70 minutes and put up an amazing show of subtle comedy, intense physicality and deep political statement-making - all without any decipherable language! They are ostensibly two world leaders who are engaged in a Summit in full public view. Their languages are different (both improvised languages, made entirely of sounds and syllables not found in any modern language).
On the face of it, it is classical comedy at its best, much in the mould of the Chaplin movies where the players evoke laughter through their everyday actions and behaviour. The lady sitting next to me was in splits all through and I can understand.
But the play also had deeper undertones.
At one level it exposed the superficiality of international politics. There are these bozos who are propped up by public opinion and who are only puppets in the hands of those who pull the strings. The actions as well as expressions of these people are based on what they are tutored about, and they look over the shoulder after every step they take in any direction. They themselves are insignificant as individuals. Here is the futility of personality-oriented diplomacy.
At another level, it threw up the question of whether modern civilisation has any strong basis. Today, our existence as individuals, families, nations and cultures is based on the thought that we are defined by our language and/ or 'organised' means of expressions. The other animals are inhuman because they are not so disciplined in how they express their thoughts. And you are a Gujarati, Bangladeshi or German based on the language that you speak. What if each individual spoke in different languages? What if what I call a computer, you call a salmon? Would we still understand each other? And if no, how important is verbal understanding?
Catch it if it comes to your city. You will not be disappointed.
p.s. Once again I was surprised at how we become uncomfortable with silence. Have you noticed that the moment lights go out and there is a pause before a performance, many of us start coughing? And that our heartbeat becomes irregular?
Posted at 1/31/2004 4:54:41 pm by Ranjan
 |  |  |
Deepan February 4, 2004 02:09 PM PST
I was reading their interview in the papers and they were talking about how they try to sense what the audiences like better and try and give more of them. Whether its the speeches, dancing or singing or even their show off antics.
I personally loved the speech bit and if i didnt know it was losely based on the Reagan-Gorbachev talks, my guess would be East-West Germany. |
 |

 |  |  |
Neena February 2, 2004 05:52 PM PST
i saw the Summit a few weeks ago when it came to Pune and LOVED it although the two chaps were putting in a lot of french and Spanish words in the gibberish -- absolutely adored their acrobatics (Is that the words). They aren't brothers though -- just colleagues and one of them used to play bass for a band from what I remember. When it was put on here, the guys spent some 20 min before the show waiting for the audience to shut up. was very strange: they just sat on those two chairs of theirs and waited , looking rather a lot like disgruntled schoolteachers who are too polite to say anything |
 |

 |  |  |
W-bug February 2, 2004 03:15 PM PST
I didn't?? Oh. Well, we'll just have to do it again then. :-D |
 |

 |  |  |
Patrix February 2, 2004 09:46 AM PST
I would personally love to see this show but I am not sure if it will ever play here but seems like an interesting take on politics |
 |

 |  |  |
Ranjan February 1, 2004 06:50 PM PST
Alka: No, i don't go to any place because its "in"... except maybe the odd pub i try once in a while.
Wandy: thats a good thought. Silence in public places vis-a-vis in private...
W-Bug: Wish you had whispered in my ears ;) |
 |

 |  |  |
W-bug February 1, 2004 06:13 PM PST
Well you've surely given it a thought!!! More than I've had time to :-( I agree that speech is only one side of any human interaction, we managed to understand everything despite their talking gibberish! In other words, tones, actions and gestures speak a whole lot more than words.
I wasn't uncomfy with the silence?! I like the suspense and expectation rather. Nice time to whisper comments to the person on your side too! Hehe |
 |

 |  |  |
wandy February 1, 2004 01:58 AM PST
Sounds like worth a watch...wonder if it'll come to this dump at some time.
Language and communication are interesting topics...cognitive and cultural understanding help..though a lot needs to be explored....
A level of comfort with silence comes usually in more individualistic places than collectivistic ones ~ but its an interesting observation!! take care!! |
 |

 |  |  |
Alka January 31, 2004 10:51 PM PST
It seems a nice show. You have given an apt account ( Fact that shows you don't go to these places just because they are "in thing" :-)).
It is true how we are at the mercy of the people who command the majority of the resources. An irony of every age and system. |
 |